banner



Rx 6600 Xt Vs Rx 6600

RX 6600 XT vs RX 6600

Price at present 407$

Games supported 100%

Price at present 328$

Games supported 99%

Full general info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, marketplace segment, value for coin and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating 60 84
Value for money 66.27 73.75
Architecture Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022) Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name Navi 23 Navi 23
Market place segment Desktop Desktop
Release date 30 July 2021 (less than a twelvemonth ago) thirteen October 2021 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $379 $329
Cost now $407 (1.1x MSRP) $328 (1x MSRP)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

General functioning parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and heave clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you lot have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Annotation that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, particularly when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 2048 1792
Cadre clock speed 1968 MHz 2044 MHz
Heave clock speed 2589 MHz 2491 MHz
Number of transistors 11,060 million 11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 7 nm
Thermal pattern ability (TDP) 160 (TGP) Watt 132 Watt
Texture fill rate 331.4 279.0

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a futurity computer configuration or upgrading an existing ane. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (ability supply compatibility).

Interface PCIe four.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
Length 190 mm 190 mm
Width two-slot 2-slot
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x eight-pin

Retentivity

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and apply a shared office of arrangement RAM.

Retentiveness type GDDR6 GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB viii GB
Retentiveness jitney width 128 Scrap 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 16000 MHz 14500 MHz
Retentivity bandwidth 256.0 GB/s 224.0 GB/s
Shared retentiveness - -

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI + +

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX 12.0 Ultimate (12_2) 12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model vi.5 half dozen.5
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 two.1
Vulkan i.two 1.2

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark functioning comparison. Notation that overall benchmark functioning is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, simply if y'all find some perceived inconsistencies, feel costless to speak up in comments department, we usually fix bug apace.

  • Passmark
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Deject Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Burn Strike Score
  • 3DMark Burn down Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing four dissever benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last existence washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX ten benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics carte with ii scenes, ane depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a infinite fleet attack on a caught planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX xi criterion by Futuremark. Information technology used four tests based on 2 scenes, ane being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is at present superseded by Fourth dimension Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX eleven characteristic level 10 criterion that was used for dwelling house PCs and basic notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Merely like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Burn Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features 2 separate tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a fiery beast seemingly fabricated of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between 2 space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, information technology is now superseded past 3DMark Dark Raid.

Criterion coverage: 8%

Gaming performance

Let'due south run across how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Detail gaming criterion results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per 2nd in a large set of pop games across different resolutions:

Full Hard disk drive 134 116
1440p 77 66
4K 43 36

Full Hd
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79

+0%

79

+0%

Full Hd
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55

+12.8%

45−l

−12.8%

Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 129

+14.two%

113

−14.2%

Battleground v 50−55

+12.8%

45−fifty

−12.8%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55

+12.eight%

45−50

−12.8%

Cyberpunk 2077 78

+0%

78

+0%

Far Cry 5 151

+12.7%

134

−12.7%

Far Cry New Dawn 131

+xi%

118

−11%

Forza Horizon four 50−55

+12.8%

45−l

−12.eight%

Hitman 3 221

+370%

45−50

−370%

Horizon Cipher Dawn 137

+14.2%

120

−14.ii%

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55

+12.8%

45−50

−12.8%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166

+17.7%

141

−17.7%

Lookout man Dogs: Legion 120

+xiv.3%

105

−fourteen.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 50−55

+12.8%

45−fifty

−12.viii%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 106

+15.2%

92

−15.2%

Battleground 5 l−55

+12.eight%

45−50

−12.8%

Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare fifty−55

+12.8%

45−50

−12.eight%

Cyberpunk 2077 76

+eight.6%

70

−8.6%

Far Cry 5 141

+eleven.9%

126

−xi.nine%

Far Cry New Dawn 127

+12.iv%

113

−12.4%

Forza Horizon iv fifty−55

+12.8%

45−50

−12.eight%

Hitman 3 183

+289%

45−fifty

−289%

Horizon Zero Dawn 109

+17.2%

93

−17.2%

Metro Exodus 95

+17.3%

81

−17.three%

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55

+12.8%

45−fifty

−12.8%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 142

+20.3%

118

−20.3%

The Witcher iii: Wild Chase 176

+15.8%

152

−15.8%

Watch Dogs: Legion 104

+10.vi%

94

−10.6%

Full Hard disk
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55

+12.8%

45−l

−12.eight%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75

−4%

78

+4%

Battlefield 5 50−55

+12.8%

45−50

−12.8%

Cyberpunk 2077 69

+19%

58

−19%

Far Cry 5 133

+xi.8%

119

−xi.8%

Far Cry New Dawn 112

+12%

100

−12%

Forza Horizon 4 fifty−55

+12.8%

45−50

−12.8%

The Witcher three: Wild Hunt 99

+10%

90

−10%

Watch Dogs: Legion 61

+v.two%

58

−five.ii%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Mod Warfare fifty−55

+12.8%

45−50

−12.viii%

Hitman 3 112

+138%

45−50

−138%

Horizon Zero Dawn 76

+18.8%

64

−18.8%

Metro Exodus 56

+19.i%

47

−19.1%

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55

+12.8%

45−50

−12.8%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84

+21.7%

69

−21.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55

+12.eight%

45−50

−12.8%

Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 56

+7.7%

52

−7.7%

Battlefield 5 50−55

+12.viii%

45−50

−12.eight%

Cyberpunk 2077 forty

+21.2%

33

−21.ii%

Far Weep 5 105

+19.3%

88

−nineteen.iii%

Far Cry New Dawn 98

+16.7%

84

−sixteen.seven%

Forza Horizon 4 l−55

+12.8%

45−50

−12.8%

Scout Dogs: Legion 44

+7.3%

41

−7.3%

4K
Loftier Preset

Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare fifty−55

+12.eight%

45−50

−12.8%

Hitman 3 57

+21.3%

45−50

−21.3%

Horizon Nothing Dawn 39

+21.9%

32

−21.ix%

Metro Exodus 34

+21.four%

28

−21.four%

Red Dead Redemption two 50−55

+12.8%

45−50

−12.8%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider twoscore

+25%

32

−25%

The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 54

+20%

45

−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 50−55

+12.8%

45−50

−12.8%

Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 28

+16.seven%

24

−xvi.vii%

Battlefield v 50−55

+12.8%

45−l

−12.8%

Cyberpunk 2077 xiv

+0%

14

+0%

Far Cry v 51

+18.vi%

43

−18.6%

Far Cry New Dawn 53

+17.8%

45

−17.8%

Forza Horizon 4 l−55

+12.viii%

45−50

−12.viii%

Watch Dogs: Legion 24

+fourteen.3%

21

−xiv.three%

Advantages and disadvantages


Functioning rating 53.xiii 46.80
Novelty 30 July 2021 13 October 2021
Cost $379 $329
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2048 1792
Retention bandwidth 256 224
Thermal pattern power (TDP) 160 Watt 132 Watt

Judging by the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical Metropolis recommends

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

since it shows meliorate operation.


Should yous still have questions concerning choice betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments department, and we shall reply.

Cast your vote

Practise you recollect we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Similar" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Competitors of Radeon RX 6600 XT by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon RX 6600 XT's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce RTX 2070, which is faster past 1% and higher by 2 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 6600 XT:

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 100

Competitors of Radeon RX 6600 by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon RX 6600 from NVIDIA is GeForce RTX 2060, which is about equal in speed and college by 1 position in our rating.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 6600:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with functioning more or less close to those reviewed, providing y'all with more options to consider.

User rating

Here y'all can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well equally charge per unit them yourself.


Rate AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT on a calibration of one to five:

Charge per unit AMD Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Hither you can inquire a question about this comparing, agree or disagree with our judgements, or study an error or mismatch.


Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/Radeon-RX-6600-XT-vs-Radeon-RX-6600

0 Response to "Rx 6600 Xt Vs Rx 6600"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel