Rx 6600 Xt Vs Rx 6600
RX 6600 XT vs RX 6600
Price at present 407$
Games supported 100%
Price at present 328$
Games supported 99%
Full general info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, marketplace segment, value for coin and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | 60 | 84 |
| Value for money | 66.27 | 73.75 |
| Architecture | Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022) | Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | Navi 23 | Navi 23 |
| Market place segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 July 2021 (less than a twelvemonth ago) | thirteen October 2021 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | $329 |
| Cost now | $407 (1.1x MSRP) | $328 (1x MSRP) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
Technical specs
General functioning parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and heave clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you lot have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Annotation that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, particularly when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1792 |
| Cadre clock speed | 1968 MHz | 2044 MHz |
| Heave clock speed | 2589 MHz | 2491 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 11,060 million | 11,060 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Thermal pattern ability (TDP) | 160 (TGP) Watt | 132 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 331.4 | 279.0 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a futurity computer configuration or upgrading an existing ane. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (ability supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe four.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 190 mm | 190 mm |
| Width | two-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x eight-pin |
Retentivity
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and apply a shared office of arrangement RAM.
| Retentiveness type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | viii GB |
| Retentiveness jitney width | 128 Scrap | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 16000 MHz | 14500 MHz |
| Retentivity bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared retentiveness | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | + | + |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12.0 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | vi.5 | half dozen.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | two.1 |
| Vulkan | i.two | 1.2 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark functioning comparison. Notation that overall benchmark functioning is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, simply if y'all find some perceived inconsistencies, feel costless to speak up in comments department, we usually fix bug apace.
- Passmark
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Deject Gate GPU
- 3DMark Burn Strike Score
- 3DMark Burn down Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing four dissever benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last existence washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX ten benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics carte with ii scenes, ane depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a infinite fleet attack on a caught planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX xi criterion by Futuremark. Information technology used four tests based on 2 scenes, ane being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is at present superseded by Fourth dimension Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX eleven characteristic level 10 criterion that was used for dwelling house PCs and basic notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Merely like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Burn Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features 2 separate tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a fiery beast seemingly fabricated of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between 2 space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, information technology is now superseded past 3DMark Dark Raid.
Criterion coverage: 8%
Gaming performance
Let'due south run across how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Detail gaming criterion results are measured in FPS.
Here are the average frames per 2nd in a large set of pop games across different resolutions:
| Full Hard disk drive | 134 | 116 |
| 1440p | 77 | 66 |
| 4K | 43 | 36 |
Full Hd
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 79 +0% | 79 +0% |
Full Hd
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−l −12.8% |
| Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla | 129 +14.two% | 113 −14.2% |
| Battleground v | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−fifty −12.8% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55 +12.eight% | 45−50 −12.8% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 78 +0% | 78 +0% |
| Far Cry 5 | 151 +12.7% | 134 −12.7% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 131 +xi% | 118 −11% |
| Forza Horizon four | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−l −12.eight% |
| Hitman 3 | 221 +370% | 45−50 −370% |
| Horizon Cipher Dawn | 137 +14.2% | 120 −14.ii% |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−50 −12.8% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 166 +17.7% | 141 −17.7% |
| Lookout man Dogs: Legion | 120 +xiv.3% | 105 −fourteen.3% |
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassinator's Creed Odyssey | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−fifty −12.viii% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 106 +15.2% | 92 −15.2% |
| Battleground 5 | l−55 +12.eight% | 45−50 −12.8% |
| Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare | fifty−55 +12.8% | 45−50 −12.eight% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 76 +eight.6% | 70 −8.6% |
| Far Cry 5 | 141 +eleven.9% | 126 −xi.nine% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 127 +12.iv% | 113 −12.4% |
| Forza Horizon iv | fifty−55 +12.8% | 45−50 −12.eight% |
| Hitman 3 | 183 +289% | 45−fifty −289% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 109 +17.2% | 93 −17.2% |
| Metro Exodus | 95 +17.3% | 81 −17.three% |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−fifty −12.8% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 142 +20.3% | 118 −20.3% |
| The Witcher iii: Wild Chase | 176 +15.8% | 152 −15.8% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 104 +10.vi% | 94 −10.6% |
Full Hard disk
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−l −12.eight% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 75 −4% | 78 +4% |
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−50 −12.8% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 69 +19% | 58 −19% |
| Far Cry 5 | 133 +xi.8% | 119 −xi.8% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 112 +12% | 100 −12% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | fifty−55 +12.8% | 45−50 −12.8% |
| The Witcher three: Wild Hunt | 99 +10% | 90 −10% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 61 +v.two% | 58 −five.ii% |
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Mod Warfare | fifty−55 +12.8% | 45−50 −12.viii% |
| Hitman 3 | 112 +138% | 45−50 −138% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 76 +18.8% | 64 −18.8% |
| Metro Exodus | 56 +19.i% | 47 −19.1% |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−50 −12.8% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 84 +21.7% | 69 −21.7% |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 50−55 +12.eight% | 45−50 −12.8% |
| Assassinator's Creed Valhalla | 56 +7.7% | 52 −7.7% |
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55 +12.viii% | 45−50 −12.eight% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | forty +21.2% | 33 −21.ii% |
| Far Weep 5 | 105 +19.3% | 88 −nineteen.iii% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 98 +16.7% | 84 −sixteen.seven% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | l−55 +12.8% | 45−50 −12.8% |
| Scout Dogs: Legion | 44 +7.3% | 41 −7.3% |
4K
Loftier Preset
| Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare | fifty−55 +12.eight% | 45−50 −12.8% |
| Hitman 3 | 57 +21.3% | 45−50 −21.3% |
| Horizon Nothing Dawn | 39 +21.9% | 32 −21.ix% |
| Metro Exodus | 34 +21.four% | 28 −21.four% |
| Red Dead Redemption two | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−50 −12.8% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | twoscore +25% | 32 −25% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Chase | 54 +20% | 45 −20% |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−50 −12.8% |
| Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla | 28 +16.seven% | 24 −xvi.vii% |
| Battlefield v | 50−55 +12.8% | 45−l −12.8% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | xiv +0% | 14 +0% |
| Far Cry v | 51 +18.vi% | 43 −18.6% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 53 +17.8% | 45 −17.8% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | l−55 +12.viii% | 45−50 −12.viii% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 24 +fourteen.3% | 21 −xiv.three% |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Functioning rating | 53.xiii | 46.80 |
| Novelty | 30 July 2021 | 13 October 2021 |
| Cost | $379 | $329 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1792 |
| Retention bandwidth | 256 | 224 |
| Thermal pattern power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 132 Watt |
Judging by the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical Metropolis recommends
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
since it shows meliorate operation.
Should yous still have questions concerning choice betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments department, and we shall reply.
Cast your vote
Practise you recollect we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Similar" button near your favorite graphics card.
Competitors of Radeon RX 6600 XT by NVIDIA
The nearest Radeon RX 6600 XT's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce RTX 2070, which is faster past 1% and higher by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 6600 XT:
Competitors of Radeon RX 6600 by NVIDIA
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon RX 6600 from NVIDIA is GeForce RTX 2060, which is about equal in speed and college by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 6600:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with functioning more or less close to those reviewed, providing y'all with more options to consider.
User rating
Here y'all can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well equally charge per unit them yourself.
Rate AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT on a calibration of one to five:
Charge per unit AMD Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Hither you can inquire a question about this comparing, agree or disagree with our judgements, or study an error or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/Radeon-RX-6600-XT-vs-Radeon-RX-6600
0 Response to "Rx 6600 Xt Vs Rx 6600"
Post a Comment